<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<modsCollection xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:slims="http://slims.web.id" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd">
<mods version="3.3" id="5890">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>E-Book :</title>
  <subTitle>Island differences in population size structure and catch per unit effort and their conservation implications for Komodo dragons</subTitle>
 </titleInfo>
 <name type="Personal Name" authority="">
  <namePart>Tim S. Jessop</namePart>
  <role>
   <roleTerm type="text">Primary Author</roleTerm>
  </role>
 </name>
 <typeOfResource manuscript="no" collection="yes">mixed material</typeOfResource>
 <genre authority="marcgt">bibliography</genre>
 <originInfo>
  <place>
   <placeTerm type="text">Australia</placeTerm>
  </place>
  <publisher>Elsevier</publisher>
  <dateIssued>2006</dateIssued>
 </originInfo>
 <language>
  <languageTerm type="code">en</languageTerm>
  <languageTerm type="text">English</languageTerm>
 </language>
 <physicalDescription>
  <form authority="gmd">Electronic Book</form>
  <extent></extent>
 </physicalDescription>
 <note>Species inhabiting archipelagos are often characterised by  high levels of  interpopulation divergence (e.g. size related traits). This divergence may, in turn, influence their life-history. To facilitate better management and conservation of the Komodo dragon (Varanus komodo- ensis),  an island endemic, we  identified demographic differences between two island pop- ulations in  Komodo National Park, Indonesia.  Comparison  of  data collected from dragon populations inhabiting Rinca Island and the much smaller Gili Motang Island indicated that between 1994   and 2004,   the  Komodo  dragon  population  on   Gili  Motang significantly decreased its:  (1) mean body mass, (2) body condition and (3) relative abundance. These results suggest that the numerically small Gili Motang population was oscillating down- wards; in contrast, the Rinca Island population had been relatively stable. More importantly these results emphasize the necessity for managers of this priority conservation species to understand  further  the  inherent  functional differences among dragon populations to develop island specific management units. Current management practices (e.g.  monitor- ing)  instigated by Komodo National Park management ignore small island dragon popula- tions and thus run the risk of being unable to detect adverse effects for populations that are&#13;
potentially most prone to  decline.</note>
 <note type="statement of responsibility">Tim S. Jessop [et.all]</note>
 <subject authority="">
  <topic>KONSERVASI</topic>
 </subject>
 <classification>570.6</classification>
 <identifier type="isbn"></identifier>
 <location>
  <physicalLocation>STIKES Tri Mandiri Sakti Bengkulu PERPUSTAKAAN</physicalLocation>
  <shelfLocator>570.6 TIM i</shelfLocator>
  <holdingSimple>
   <copyInformation>
    <numerationAndChronology type="1">B15006557</numerationAndChronology>
    <sublocation>series_title</sublocation>
    <shelfLocator>570.6 TIM i</shelfLocator>
   </copyInformation>
  </holdingSimple>
 </location>
 <slims:digitals>
  <slims:digital_item id="723" url="" path="/937e0af960308b7700db972133f88fd2.pdf" mimetype="application/pdf">Island differences in population size structure and catch per unit effort and their conservation implications for Komodo dragons</slims:digital_item>
 </slims:digitals>
 <slims:image>JURNAL_BIOLOGICAL_CONSERVATION_2007.jpg.jpg</slims:image>
 <recordInfo>
  <recordIdentifier>5890</recordIdentifier>
  <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2026-02-05 11:02:52</recordCreationDate>
  <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2026-05-04 14:03:47</recordChangeDate>
  <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 </recordInfo>
</mods>
</modsCollection>